Poet Harry Giles presented theÂ Edinburgh Fringe Sustainable Practice AwardÂ 2017 on Friday 25 August. Read his provocation to the audience, to the Awards, to the Edinburgh Fringe, below.
Iâ€™m going to start with a confession, which is that I havenâ€™t seen a single Fringe show this year. I have a couple of excuses â€“ I moved house this month, and Iâ€™ve had a job in Glasgow all this week. But truth be told I didnâ€™t avoid moving in August when we were given the purchase date, and I actively organised to spend a third of the Fringe in Glasgow. Whoops.
August in Edinburgh is the month of break-ups and breakdowns. Every year at least one of my friends has a major life crisis and needs looking after â€“ sometimes itâ€™s me. Itâ€™s something in the air, or in the market. Iâ€™m an artist, and have a number of different roles in the arts, so in August the city is full of my friends from across the country â€“ and the world â€“ but I donâ€™t usually get to see them until they start to crack. You can see it in the Facebook status updates and midnight texts: as the month proceeds more and more of us get more and more broken. Bits of us fall of, and we hope thereâ€™s enough of us to last to the end of the month. We hibernate and regenerate for most of September.
We all know that the Fringe is unsustainable, and increasingly folk are willing to say it. The physical and emotional unsustainability thatâ€™s clear to anyone working or living here in August â€“ the atmosphere of constant activity, the expectation of constant work, the late nights, the unending obligations, the crowds, the noise, the failures, the debt â€“ is a direct and systemic product of the economic, social and environmental unsustainability. Focus on that jargon for a moment and think about what it means: activity that cannot be sustained. It literally canâ€™t keep going forever.
A little background on me before I keep going. My undergraduate degree was in that glorious oxymoron, Sustainable Development, the latest in a long line of self-contradictory political terms, like Free Market, Democratic Election, or Pursuit of Happiness. After a theatre masters, I worked as the Environment Officer across all the Edinburgh Festivals, including the Fringe. Now Iâ€™m an independent writer and performer, just about making a living from it, making work that focusses in one way or another on radical social change. It might seem a bit odd, given all those optimistic pursuits, that Iâ€™m now being so profoundly negative, but Iâ€™ll come back to that. First, I want to have a hard look at the problem.
First, the economic and social unsustainability. The Fringe is a festival of the rentier: artists struggle to make money, most pay to perform and many lose money; venue staff and volunteers frequently suffer highly exploitative and often illegal working conditions; a very few venues make money and that trickles up to the top; the only real profit is in owning a pub, or a hotel, or an AirBnB room â€“ or a University. On top of that, the gravitational pull of the Fringe means thereâ€™s three months of the year where performing artists canâ€™t really find paying work, and the huge August revenue hasnâ€™t stopped year-round independent venues from closing year on year, with music in Edinburgh suffering the most. This is a completely unworkable economic, financial and cultural model: it cannot keep going.
Then, the environmental unsustainability. Weâ€™ve built the economy of a whole city on a system of international air travel that literally cannot be sustained: itâ€™s just a question of whether the oil runs out or the planet floods first. The city is a blaze of light 24 hours a day â€“ so many lights it doesnâ€™t seem to matter whether theyâ€™re energy-saving lamps or not â€“ for the month of the year with the most sun. A festival is always a heterotopia, a space of alterity where normal rules donâ€™t apply, a space of excess and celebration and consumption â€“ which is wonderful! â€“ but a month-long conglomeration of festivals means a month where extraordinary levels of production and consumption are expected to be sustained and canâ€™t be sustained. You canâ€™t live that way for that long. Itâ€™s psychologically, spiritually, financially and environmentally exhausting: it drains you til thereâ€™s nothing left.
And just to dwell in the negativity for a bit longer: letâ€™s admit the extent of the crisis. We know weâ€™re burning up. Weâ€™re shooting past emissions reductions targets. Forests are still being chopped down, rare earth metal and fossil fuel supplies are still being exhausted, sea levels are rising along with climate refugee numbers, coral is bleaching, ice is melting: every alarm bell is ringing and most of us, myself included, only make it through the day by stopping our ear s. I spent summers in my 20s camping in fields plotting how to shut down power stations and banks, and Iâ€™ve stopped doing that not because I donâ€™t believe in it but because Iâ€™m struggling to see how those actions can halt a crisis of this scale, and ignoring the problem seems more liveable than engaging it.
So why my work, and why this Award? If everythingâ€™s so bad, why am I supporting engaging with it? If the Fringe is so bad, why celebrate it?
The truth is, Iâ€™m not remotely interested in labelling things as bad. I think that social movements â€“ and the environmental movement in particular â€“ is overly invested in a destructively puritan ethics of individual guilt and culpability, in prescribing and proscribing actions that will clean up your personal moral slate so you can feel better about yourself. The boycott has moved from being an insurgent tactic of economic transformation to an individual decision about what product choices best reflect your self-identity. The dominant message the environmental movement has succeeded in getting across is not â€œOil companies and banks and airlines are literally destroying the earth, letâ€™s rise together to get rid of themâ€ but rather â€œChange your lightbulbs and separate your rubbish or youâ€™re a bad personâ€. (I havenâ€™t done the maths, but Iâ€™d bet at least a tenner that if everyone household in the world switched to energy-saving lightbulbs we still wouldnâ€™t stay below a two degree temperature rise.) So I have no interest in condemning artists and audiences who participate in the Fringe, or indeed Fringe Festival Society staff, many of whom I know well and have worked with, many of whom see exactly the same problems and feel the same level of powerlessness in fixing it. (Landlords, on the other handâ€¦) Iâ€™ve avoided the Fringe this year because Iâ€™m tired, not because I think itâ€™s bad.
In fact, trying to do sustainable practice at the Fringe is emblematic of trying to sustain life on this planet: itâ€™s a struggle against huge economic and political forces it seems impossible to influence, itâ€™s a struggle participating in which makes you feel dirty and compromised and often hopeless, and itâ€™s also the only choice we have, because there isnâ€™t another planet. It is worth participating in this struggle. There is no outside. There is no escape. There is no being pure. There is only working with the conditions youâ€™ve got now, trying to make something better. The challenge of sustainability in any context is not how to make yourself the most pure, the most blessed by the green beard in the sky, the most enthusiastic about telling people how to change lightbulbs, but how to stick a spanner in the works of a death machine without getting crushed yourself.
So whatâ€™s the kind of art that Iâ€™m looking for? Iâ€™m looking for art that stares directly at the problem, even with the risk of irreperable eye damage, and speaks a truth about it that people donâ€™t want to hear and canâ€™t help but hear. Iâ€™m looking for art that doesnâ€™t just advocate for change, but is an act of change: a transitional demand that changes society in its demanding. Iâ€™m looking for art that doesnâ€™t think itâ€™s any better than the rest of us, but somehow makes us all better through its making. Iâ€™m looking for art thatâ€™s willing to get dirty. Iâ€™m looking for art that understands and admits to its present conditions, and creates a space to change them. I prefer peasants and labourers to prophets and messiahs: Iâ€™m looking for art with decent working conditions, that knows what work is, thatâ€™s working with us. Iâ€™m looking for art that shows us the other world which is not possible but actual, now. Iâ€™m looking for art that is a howl of pain and rage loud enough to clear a space for something else to happen.
Before announcing the award, and congratulating the people whoâ€™ve risen that challenge, Iâ€™m going to finish with a poem. Iâ€™m already feeling that these words are clumsy and donâ€™t quite say what I wanted them to say. Prose is too literal, too easily excerpted and quoted and misquoted, at least the way I write it. This poem is a story I wrote for my friend, the theate critic Maddy Costa, and itâ€™s about everything Iâ€™ve just been talking about.
THE LONGING FOR ONE THING INSIDE OF ANOTHER
There was a world where tokens were exchanged
for food, and when a token met your hand
a spur extended blandly into your palm
to take a sip of blood. This payment kept
the tokens bright enough to check your hair in,
cool enough to glide from purse to purse.
And in this world there were two friends who made
assemblages of wood and steel: stairways,
sunshades, simple things to see through, things
to pause on, things to touch. They worked apart,
and then from time to time they met to look
and say, â€œThis worksâ€, and say, â€œThis doesnâ€™t work.â€
One day one friend came with a gift, a question.
They bought some time discussing techniques, and then
they said, â€œI heard your purse was light. I saw
your building shed was empty and your tools
were sore for oil.â€ And they held out their hand
with sixteen hungry tokens free to take.
Now, both these friends were just the kind of folk
to argue far too hard about the way
things are on other worlds, or could be, or were,
and how to cross between them without snapping
painful laws of space and time. At times,
they held that wood and steel could build a bridge
to where a body could eat without blood.
And so they laughed as they watched the sixteen tokens
pass from palm to palm and felt the prick
and wiped the reddish smears on the handkerchiefs
that all folk carry tucked in their back pocket,
the depth of dye declaring the force of the flag.
The post Blog: Harry Giles â€“ A provocation for the Edinburgh Fringe appeared first on Creative Carbon Scotland.
AboutÂ Creative Carbon Scotland:
Creative Carbon Scotland is a partnership of arts organisations working to put culture at the heart of a sustainable Scotland. We believe cultural and creative organisations have a significant influencing power to help shape a sustainable Scotland for the 21st century.
In 2011 we worked with partners Festivals Edinburgh, the Federation of Scottish Threatre and Scottish Contemporary Art Network to support over thirty arts organisations to operate more sustainably.
We are now building on these achievements and working with over 70 cultural organisations across Scotland in various key areas including carbon management, behavioural change and advocacy for sustainable practice in the arts.
Our work with cultural organisations is the first step towards a wider change. Cultural organisations can influence public behaviour and attitudes about climate change through:
Changing their own behaviour;
Communicating with their audiences;
Engaging the publicâ€™s emotions, values and ideas.