â€œashdenizen blog and twitter are consistently among the best sources for information and reflection on developments in the field of arts and climate change in the UKâ€ (2020 Network)
ashdenizen is edited by Robert Butler, and is the blog associated with the Ashden Directory, a website focusing on environment and performance.
The Ashden Directory is edited by Robert Butler and Wallace Heim, with associate editor Kellie Gutman. The Directory includes features, interviews, news, a timeline and a database of ecologically – themed productions since 1893 in the United Kingdom. Our own projects include ‘New Metaphors for Sustainability’, ‘Flowers Onstage’ and ‘Six ways to look at climate change and theatre’.
Resilience, one of the two plays that formÂ The Contingency Plan by Steve Waters
Given that theatre presents itself as a form that is profoundly engaged in the politics of the present, that weâ€™re a country that produced David Hare, David Edgar, Howard Brenton and Harold Pinter, why has there been so little theatre about the most central political issue of the time?
Last night I was at one of the events put on by theÂ Cultures of Climate Change group at the University ofÂ Cambridge;Â Time To Act: The Theatre of Climate Change. The blogger/journalistÂ Robert Butler was interviewing playwright Steve Waters about his playÂ The Contingency Plan. The Contingency Plan at The Bush Theatre earlier this year was the first time someone has pulled off a really intelligent piece of theatre about climate change.Â Eventhecritics agreed. Set in the very near future, it involves events â€“ personal and political â€“ leading up at a major storm surge that appears to be about to flood a significant section of the East Anglian coast. (Rob mentioned a great moment at the press night for the play when the Daily Telegraphâ€™s reviewer turned to him at the interval and said, aghast, â€œRobert, tell me all this isnâ€™t true?â€ Robert had to break the news to him).
Waters made the point that he was initially taken aback that no one else had written a play that dealt directly and successfully with the subject. He also became very conscious at the time of writing that the British theatre establishment wasnâ€™t really looking a play on the topic.
Partly this is because theatre acknowleges something we all understand. The complex, slowly unfolding narrative of climate change is one thatâ€™s incredibly inconvenient for artists. It is not, we tend to assume, particularly dramatic in itself. Robert Butler discussed this in a review ofThe Contingency Plan inÂ Intelligent Life magazine earlier this year:
Climate change is a difficult subject for dramatists. Three years ago Caryl Churchill, a playwright, introduced a talk by two leading environmental scientists by stressing that their work raises an essential dramatic problem: one of distance.To transport science to the stage, a playwright must not only clarify complicated ideas for laypeople, but also evoke the tension of cause and effect. The problem with climate change is that what happens in one place often ends up affecting people in an entirely different place, and at a remote time. The two worlds can seem unrelated. Whereâ€™s the catalyst for drama?
As Butler went on to say, Waters succeeds in closing that gap by a having two plays within the single work â€“ and as Peter Gingold ofÂ Tippingpoint mentioned on the way out, by being very clever indeed. Having written it though, Waters is also aware that the UK theatre establishment was probably only looking forÂ one play on climate change.
In response to that thought Butler mentioned aÂ discussion heâ€™d heard on Radio 4â€™sÂ The World Tonight the night before, in which Mike Hulme, Professor of Climate Change at the University of East Anglia, said we have made life difficult for ourselves by the way weâ€™ve approached the issue of climate change:
One of the arguments I make about Copenhagen, says Hulme,Â is that weâ€™ve stitched together so many concerns â€“ quite serious and real concerns â€“ under one umbrella [namely, the reduction of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere]. Itâ€™s a bit like the Rubikâ€™s Cube that came out some years ago. There are so many different combinations that I could never solve it. And this is what weâ€™ve created with Climate Change. A Rubikâ€™s Cube that we canâ€™t solve. Whereas if we begin to tease out the various elements of the problem â€“ the problems of development, the problems of adaptation, the problems of short-lived greenhouse gasses like methane or black soot, separate those out from the problems of long-lived CO2, we could find a much easier set of pathways.
It was a great discussion; Butler did a brilliant job of throwing new thoughts into the ring for Waters to bat back. Iâ€™m still trying to work out whether I agree with what Hume says as a political way to approach climate change, but artistically that makes a lot of sense. Even if , hypothetically speaking,Â Steve Waters has written THE play about climate change, there is huge scope still to pull the Rubikâ€™s Cube apart to allow us to make profounder sense of climate change.
Thanks to Benjamin Morris and Bradon Smith for the event.
Steve mentioned that theÂ The Contingency Plan will be aired by the BBC on Dec 13 to coincide with COP15. Iâ€™ll keep you posted with the details.
Well we have to be doing something right, because McKie’s article got this response from factually wayward Daily Telegraph young fogey James Delingpole, lambasting “eco-luvvies”. It’s a conspiracy! froths Delingpole:
What Cape Farewell does brilliantly, Delingpole fulminates, is breed wave after wave of high profile propagandists for the authorised Al … Go to RSA Arts & Ecology